Posted by alexandra_k on December 3, 2005, at 23:51:07
In reply to Re: objectification, posted by caraher on December 3, 2005, at 23:05:03
> > > You seem to equate a girlfriend with a (low-cost?) outlet for sexual desires - which is certainly ONE role of a girlfriend...
> > one role of a girlfriend?
> > charming...
> hehe... I'm shooting for the lowest common denominator here
well... i suppose Kant might possibly allow that it isn't treating someone as a *mere* object...
;-)
poster:alexandra_k
thread:579342
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/relate/20051031/msgs/585267.html