Re: objectification » caraher

Posted by alexandra_k on December 3, 2005, at 22:48:45

In reply to Re: reverse objectification, posted by caraher on December 3, 2005, at 22:21:51

> You seem to equate a girlfriend with a (low-cost?) outlet for sexual desires - which is certainly ONE role of a girlfriend...
one role of a girlfriend?
charming...

Thread

no girlfriend so I turned to prostition MichaelJr 11/16/05
...
Re: sorry for typo (or spelling problem actually) (nm) alexandra_k 11/21/05
Re: no girlfriend so I turned to prostition » alexandra_k TexasChic 11/23/05
reverse objectification » alexandra_k zeugma 11/24/05
Re: reverse objectification » zeugma alexandra_k 11/25/05
Re: You still with us???? » MichaelJr alexandra_k 11/25/05
Re: reverse objectification alexandra_k 11/25/05
Re: Brothel catering to women » TexasChic caraher 11/26/05
Re: reverse objectification » alexandra_k zeugma 11/28/05
Re: reverse objectification MichaelJr 12/3/05
Re: objectification » MichaelJr alexandra_k 12/3/05
PS » MichaelJr alexandra_k 12/3/05
Re: reverse objectification caraher 12/3/05
Re: objectification » caraher alexandra_k 12/3/05
Re: objectification caraher 12/3/05
Re: objectification » caraher alexandra_k 12/3/05
Re: objectification alexandra_k 12/3/05
Re: please be civil » MichaelJr » alexandra_k » caraher Dr. Bob 12/4/05
Re: sorry folks... alexandra_k 12/4/05
Re: thanks (nm) » alexandra_k Dr. Bob 12/4/05
Re: reverse objectification TexasChic 12/5/05
Nevertheless » MichaelJr Tamar 12/6/05
Re: Nevertheless jonquiljo 12/7/05
Re: please be civil » Dr. Bob alexandra_k2 12/15/05
Redirect: directing the header Dr. Bob 12/19/05

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:alexandra_k thread:579342
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/relate/20051031/msgs/585226.html