Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: The Hsiung-Pilder discussion

Posted by Dr. Bob on August 3, 2014, at 10:22:56

In reply to Lou's reply-The Hsiung-Pilder discussion-truzme » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on July 29, 2014, at 9:14:20

> D. Some of Lou's notifications that are outstanding pre-date 2013
> F. Statements that insult Judaism in particular but not limited to, are showing unsanctioned before 2013.
> G. Statements that defame Lou are showing unsanctioned that were posted before 2013.

I didn't mean to imply that my policy didn't change until 2013. It had been evolving before that, but I may not have made it explicit until then.

--

> A. If you do or do not have a notification from me concerning the statement in question

OK, I looked, and in fact I do.

> B. If you are willing to turn over your archive of notifications to an impartial body for discovery

No.

> C. Why you posted what you did here {except maybe you}, if you would not have sanctioned the statement anyway even if there is the notification from me on the grounds that you state that you will use the discriminatory policy to act on notifications except for some of Lou's.

Sorry, could you repeat your question?

> D. What the good is by you leaving the defamation against me to be seen as civil in the post where it is posted originally, since your thinking is that what you do will be good for this community as a whole, and for readers to trust you at that.

1. Not sanctioning it could lead to it being seen as civil, but not necessarily.

2. The good I see is that intervening less = trusting the community, including yourself, more.

> E. Why do you want readers to trust you in what you do in your thinking here if defamation is allowed to be seen as civil where it is originally posted if your rule is to not post anything that could lead one to feel accused or put down?

If they trust me, (1) there may be less conflict here and (2) they may be more able to trust others.

Bob


a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Dr. Bob thread:1050116
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1069146.html