Posted by Larry Hoover on August 22, 2004, at 9:51:43
In reply to Re: NADH Co-Q10 » Larry Hoover, posted by KaraS on August 21, 2004, at 2:50:19
> > CoQ10 is an antioxidant. Idebenone is a better antioxidant. If you are going for antioxidant effect, then yes, it is better. There is no substitute for CoQ10 in mitochondrial energy transfer functions.
>
> I guess you just answered the question I posed in my previous post about coQ10. Probably should be on my list.There is a fair amount of CoQ10 in your food. It's in both meat and vegetables. Purifying it is what makes it so expensive. You may not need extra, ya know?
> > Just for the record, one of the most powerful antioxidants is melatonin. I don't think people use it for that, though.
>
> With good reason. It's a hormone and there's too much else involved. (No?)Yes.
> > > > Take six grams of TMG and see if you still feel that way. ;-)
> > >
> > > > Lar
> > >
> > > You're kidding with that dose, right?
> >
> > No. Not kidding. I bet you get a kick from it. Safe, but it would make a point, eh?
> >
>
> I got no kick from SAM-e so maybe I won't get a kick from TMG either but I'll have to do the experiment to find out.I'm serious about the dose. Some people need that much, or more, to feel the effect. Thinking you need an atom bomb is a rather limiting perception.
> > > Be well and prosper,
> > >
> > > Kara
> >
> > You too. We will, you know.
> >
> > Lar
>
> I don't know but I'll take your word on it for now.
>
> -KAhhh, the underpinnings of faith arise. I wish I knew an emoticon for Buddha's smile.
Lar
poster:Larry Hoover
thread:359642
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/alter/20040815/msgs/380782.html