Posted by lostforwards on December 4, 2004, at 21:04:21
In reply to fantisies..., posted by alexandra_k on December 4, 2004, at 10:51:03
Animalistic isn't a bad thing. I think the very nature of love, not just sex, is "primitive". Have you ever seen two mice groom each other? That's love. I know it's anthropomorphic for me to make that statement, but I'm not trying to be a scientist. Sex is a part of love, one can come before the other. I don't see anything ugly about animals acting on their instincts. To me love is intinctual. It's not something that grew out of the victorian era, or appeared after the agricultural revolution. Love was with us, innately since the begining of time.
I'm not sure what the prevalance of abuse is among animals. I know there's killing for food. I 'm not sure if anyone can provide me evidence of killing for sport.
Human beings have managed to divert their sexual energy and do all sorts of heinous things including abuse and in every way pathologize each other.
Personally, I get off on women who are smiling or at least enjoying themselves. Negative vibes give me a bad feeling. I couldn't watch porn where a woman was suffering or anybody was suffering against their will.
Abuse just isn't natural. Sex, love, and the human body minus all of our fabrications about what's right and wrong, is.
poster:lostforwards
thread:419858
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/relate/20041118/msgs/424473.html