Psycho-Babble Medication | about biological treatments | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: efficacy and approval

Posted by Snoozy on June 19, 2003, at 16:46:56

In reply to Re: SSRI conspiracies--nonexistent., posted by Jack Smith on June 19, 2003, at 15:55:23

I'm wondering if the FDA has guidelines on how effective a drug must be to get approval. If there were no or few other drugs on the market to treat a specific condition, would they approve something that had a lower efficacy rating as opposed to a proposed drug for which there are many alternatives available?

I'm also wondering what, if any, type of political appointments (other than commissioner) are made there.

> Reboxetine was probably not approved because it was not that effective. Note that Lilly did not attempt to get straterra approved for depression probably because they knew that it was not effective enough. Norepinephrine only agents have proven less effective for depression.
>
> Check through the archives of this site and you will see that reboxetine did not exactly get reviewed well here.
>
> JACK


Share
Tweet  

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Medication | Framed

poster:Snoozy thread:235009
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030619/msgs/235191.html