Re: Lilly controls the FDA--NOT

Posted by stjames on June 19, 2003, at 13:17:31

In reply to Lilly controls the FDA--NOT, posted by Jack Smith on June 19, 2003, at 12:13:48

>
> The pharmaceutical companies are the cause of all of our problems.
>
> JACK

Gee, that is a sweeping generalization !

Thread

Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) turalizz 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) Snoozy 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) » McPac Barbara Cat 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) Caleb462 6/19/03
SSRI conspiracies--nonexistent. Jack Smith 6/19/03
Lilly controls the FDA--NOT Jack Smith 6/19/03
Caleb, (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
Re: Caleb, (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) Caleb462 6/19/03
Re: Lilly controls the FDA--NOT McPac 6/19/03
Re: Lilly controls the FDA--NOT stjames 6/19/03
Re: SSRI conspiracies--nonexistent. McPac 6/19/03
Caleb, (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
Re: SSRI conspiracies--nonexistent. McPac 6/19/03
Re: Caleb, (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) Caleb462 6/19/03
Re: Lilly controls the FDA--NOT » stjames Jack Smith 6/19/03
Re: SSRI conspiracies--nonexistent. Jack Smith 6/19/03
Re: efficacy and approval Snoozy 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) » McPac turalizz 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) NikkiT2 6/19/03
Re: SSRI conspiracies--nonexistent. Caleb462 6/19/03
Re: Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) » NikkiT2 turalizz 6/19/03
tura Reboxetine (not approved in U.S.? FDA blows!) McPac 6/19/03
...
Re: BARBCAT, Re: Question for McPac re OCD » McPac Barbara Cat 7/2/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:stjames thread:235009
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20030619/msgs/235111.html

	for
in