MITCH - thanks once again, now I understand:

Posted by Janelle on September 24, 2001, at 0:50:11

In reply to Re: MITCH: thanks and I've got a question 4 U: » Janelle, posted by Mitch on September 24, 2001, at 0:42:17

I'm the opposite of you in that I am a very DETAIL-oriented person, who often overlooks the broader picture! Thanks for taking the time to return here and explain where you were coming from with the forest-trees analogy. I understand that very well now!
-Janelle

Thread

In PLAIN English, can someone please explain... Janelle 9/21/01
...
Re: Monominergic theories could be horse hockey » stjames jay 9/22/01
Re: Monominergic theories could be horse hockey » jay SLS 9/22/01
HELP! Now what are MONAMINES (spelling) ?!?? Janelle 9/23/01
Re: Monominergic theories could be horse hockey jay 9/23/01
Re: In PLAIN English, can someone please explain... » Janelle Mitch 9/23/01
Re: Monominergic theories could be horse hockey stjames 9/23/01
Can SOMEONE just DEFINE what is a MONOAMINE?! (nm) Janelle 9/23/01
Re: Can SOMEONE just DEFINE what is a MONOAMINE?! Mitch 9/23/01
Re: Monominergic theories could be horse hockey » jay SLS 9/23/01
MITCH: thanks and I've got a question 4 U: » Mitch Janelle 9/23/01
Re: MITCH: thanks and I've got a question 4 U: » Janelle SLS 9/24/01
Re: MITCH: thanks and I've got a question 4 U: » Janelle Mitch 9/24/01
MITCH - thanks once again, now I understand: Janelle 9/24/01

Post a new follow-up

[79428]

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Janelle thread:79238
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20010917/msgs/79428.html