Psycho-Babble Relationships | about interpersonal relationships | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

romantic love

Posted by alexandra_k on October 18, 2005, at 1:22:33

I just knew I'd come across this idea again...

'An interesting example with which to develop the Machiavellian perspective is romantic love. Most accounts of this emotion regard it as a device to create and maintain long-term pair bonds. According to Robert Frank, love is a 'commitment mechanism' a guarantee that a person will remain committed to a relationship even when temporarily more rewarding relationships become available (Frank, 1988). A special emotion is needed for this purpose, because simple means-end rationality will dictate choosing the current best option at each moment. Melvyn Konner, in contrast, has pointed out that in traditional societies few people have the option of forming a long-term pair bond on the basis of romantic attraction. Instead, he suggests that the irruptive, passionate love that western societies treat as teh occasion for the formation of life-long partnerships may have as its primary evolutionary function motivating behaviours such as mate desertion and copulation outside the pair bond (kinner, 1982: 315-316). This suggestion has become more credible since it was first made in the light of the increasing emphasis in behavioural ecology on female promiscuity. Females in a wide range of species search for the 'best genes' independent of the need in many of the same species to maintain a stable bond with a single male to provide economic support for offspring. In humans, mate desertion and promiscuity are risky behaviours as far as immediate survival goes. They carry a high probability of agonistic interactions with other members of the group. If the advantages of these behaviours for reproductive fitness are great enough, however, love might evolve as a special motivational system designed, not to enforce commitment when impulse argues against it, but to motivate adultery when prudence argues against it'.

Paul Griffiths: Basic Emotions, Complex Emotions, Machiavellian Emotions p33-34

Available from:

http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00000604/00/Machiavellian_Emotions.pdf

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Relationships | Framed

poster:alexandra_k thread:568417
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/relate/20051002/msgs/568417.html