Posted by Lou Pilder on April 1, 2014, at 11:21:30
In reply to Lou's response-everyone? » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on December 18, 2010, at 17:43:12
> > > Why pick on one "although you were rude to me" when the rest of the post is helpful and encouraging?
> > >
> > > Maxime
> >
> > > I guess it doesn't matter what the main message or majority of content of the message was, it just takes a small statement that violates the rules to get a warning and subsequent block.
> > >
> > > morgan miller
> >
> > Yes, even a small statement can lead someone to feel accused or put down.
> >
> > I expect everyone to be civil all the time. Respecting the speed limit most of the time doesn't mean we get to speed the rest of the time.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> Yiu wrote,[...I expext everyone to be civil all the time...]
> I am unsure as to whatt you are wanting to mean here by that. If you could post answrs here to the followinng, I could have the opportunity to post my response to what ou post to me.
> A. In your use of that {everyone} is to be civil all the time, are you included in the {everyone} or is the word just for your guests here?
> B. Civil means conducive to the harmony and welfare of the the commmunity. If that be the case, could the function(s) of the administration be considerd by you to regulate the harmony and welfare of the members?
> C. If not, could you post here why not?
> D. Now if the administration thinks that by doing the functions of the administration could regulate the harmony and welfare of the group, then could it also be considerd by you that the administration could harm the harmony and welfare of the members by not fulfilling their adminstrative functions?
> E. If so, could it be considerd by you that leaving notifications outstanding and also requests for clarification and such and requests for your rationales outstanding cause disharmony and also be detrimental to the welfare of a member or members?
> F. If you do not consider that the administrative functions , in particular but not limited to outstanding notifications and outstanding requests, could affect the harmony annd welfare of tthe members here, could you post here your rationale for such?
> G You state here that your administrative function is to not let a match be, for one match could cause a forest fire. Would you agree then that by leaving notifications and requests outstanding that by doing so there could be a potential danger to a person or persons from what is left to have the potential of escalating like a fire?
> H. You write here that you take responsibility for what you write. If one here is harmed by the nature that a post is not sanctioned and notifications were not acted on, could you consider taking the responsibility of the harm if there is harm, such as a suicide or if one becomes a victim of violence due to the unsantioned statemennt that could lead to ill-will being fosterd to a person or persons?
> K. If in that scenerio, if it happens, and you will not accept responsibility, could you post here your rationale for such, even if it is due to negligence in perfomimg administrative functions?
> L. would you be willing to delete the entire threads where my notifications are outstanding and then reinstate them after the notifications are acted on? If not, could you post here your rationale for such?
> Lou PilderFriends,
I an asking that you review the questions that I have here to Mr. Hsiung and be a discussant in parallel threads and/or threads involving the concern of mine that anti-Semitic statements are being allowed to be seen here as civil and supportive and will be good for the community as a whole as that those statements are not repudiated by Mr. Hsiung and his deputies of record. One in question now is ,[...No non-Christian can enter heaven...] which a subset of readers could think is analogous to ,[...only Christians can enter heaven...].
Mr Hsiung states that he will respond to notifications but he will give himself the option to not respond to my notifications and the questions above are also not responded to so a subset of readers could think that he is giving himself the option to not respond to me at all. His rationale posted here is that if readers see that he does not respond to me, then this could encourage others to not respond to me. That is true, but are you one of those people that are influenced by Mr. Hsiung in any way to not respond to me? If so, what is influencing you to not respond to me? Could not Mr. Hsiung by posting such create stigmatization toward me and decrease the respect and regard and confidence in which I am held? And could his option to not respond to me, that he says could influence others to not respond to me, create hostile and disagreeable feelings toward me?
I am trying to save lives here and purge the anti-Semitic statements out of here. I am asking that you join me in my goal.
Won't you be my neighbor.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:973900
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20140304/msgs/1063537.html