Posted by Dr. Bob on January 6, 2014, at 22:39:22
In reply to Lou's rply-The Hsiung-Pilder discussion-mhalzphoar » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on January 6, 2014, at 10:02:38
> A. It is my intent, Lou, to allow the statement in question to stand.
False. It's my intent to work out a reply to that post with you.
> B. I have a justification, or excuse ,Lou, for me not posting that the statement is not in accordance with my rule to not post anything that could put down those of other faiths.
True. I believe that you posting a reply would address the issue more effectively than me posting a reply.
> B. I agree, Lou, that innocent readers such as a Jewish child, or a child that is of another Abrahamic faith, finding this site in a search that is in depression, could feel humiliated when they read the post in question as not being sanctioned and go deeper into depression and could commit suicide after reading the post in question and seeing that it could be seen as supportive and will be good for this community as a whole on the basis that I have stated that what is not sanctioned could be thought to be conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of this community as a whole.
True, that's possible. But it would require jumping to a conclusion (that it was supportive and good for the community). But you posting a reply could prevent jumping to that conclusion.
> C. I am not concerned, Lou, that there could be consequences to innocent readers when they see that the statement in question stands, for if I was concerned, I would post a repudiation to the statement now.
False. I'm concerned, which is why I'm trying to work out a reply to that post with you.
> D. A way for me to post a repudiation to the statement in question will be____________________
I believe that you posting a repudiation would address the issue more effectively than me posting a repudiation.
> E. I am not going to post to the statement in question something like what I posted concerning the other anti-Semitic statements that you, Lou, showed me my error to, for my justification for not doing that is:_____________________________
I believe that you posting a reply would address the issue more effectively than me posting a reply.
> F. By my allowing the statement to stand, Lou, that will be good for his community as a whole because:_______________________________________
It's my intent to work out a reply to that post with you.
> G. I understand, Lou, that statements that put down Jews or others are not in accordance with my rule to not post what could put down those of other faiths, but I am going allow this one in question here to stand because: ________________
It's my intent to work out a reply to that post with you.
Bob
a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:1050116
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20131217/msgs/1058007.html