Posted by Dr. Bob on January 5, 2014, at 2:25:20
In reply to Lou's reply-The Hsiung-Pilder discussion-pstlbrng, posted by Lou Pilder on January 4, 2014, at 20:40:09
> The readers are led to believe what can be seen by what you have posted here. What readers can be led to believe is that what is posted, and not sanctioned, is considered by you to be conducive to the civic harmony and welfare of the community, and supportive, and will be good for this community as a whole as stated in your TOS here.
> The anti-Semitic statements that I am asking for you to post a repudiation to, could reverse the thinking of a subset of people that could think that by the statements standing, that those anti-Semitic statements are supportive and will be good for this community as a whole.Another way to look at this is:
Readers could believe that what was posted about you and not repudiated by you was considered by you to be accurate. The statements I'm asking you to post could reverse that thinking.
Bob
a brilliant and reticent Web mastermind -- The New York Times
backpedals well -- PartlyCloudy
poster:Dr. Bob
thread:1050116
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20131217/msgs/1057837.html