Posted by Lou PIlder on November 19, 2012, at 8:24:46
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-heerpsehy » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on October 21, 2012, at 11:29:05
> Neither do I. Nor do I accept cherrypicked and improperly interpreted studies as fact.
>
> But to clarify, by "it" I was referring to my family members who were dangerous before they even had a bit of psychiatric medication and less dangerous after. Not to this particular woman, who apparently did take medications at times (and was, according to her family less dangerous when she did.) The focus of the article was the cost and difficulty of obtaining proper treatment.
>
> If you aren't willing to consider that you may be harming others, there's not much I can do. You'll harm or not, and it's beyond my control. I imagine anyone who is thinking clearly can easily judge your posts on their merits, and treat them accordingly. I think Dr. Bob is doing a disservice to those who may be particularly vulnerable at any given time.
>
> If you're going around telling posters they are harming people by pushing medications, calling them drug pushers, etc. I think it is perfectly ok for others to point out that you may be harming people. Why do you think it's ok for you to do it, but not for others to respond by pointing out the dangers and irresponsibility of your own posts? Do you report yourself when you call other Babblers names? Or accuse them of drug pushing?
>
> I personally don't think either is particularly civil. But what can we do when we're abandoned? We are abandoned, and need to rely on what tools we have.
>
> I don't understand AT ALL why you give a fat rat's *ss what Dr. Bob thinks about your posts or what he does and doesn't allow.
>
> DR. BOB IS NOT MONITORING THE D*MN FORUM! SAY WHAT YOU LIKE!
>
> Just recognize that people will show you the same level of respect and courtesy that you show them.D,
Please do not post here statements that could have the potential for others to see me in a false light. Mr Hsiung is allowing you to post these statements and they could thearfore be considered to be supportive. By the nature that you have not specified where I have said what you say I have said, I do not have the opportunity to respond to what you have posted here about me. I do not believe that I have posted here that others are {drug pushers} and since there is not a post specifying such by you, I can not post my response to what is not there.
It is not perfectly OK with me for others to say that I am harming people. For you or any other to post that here is putting me in a false light, for I have come here to save lives and offer a way for those that are captive to the drug(s) and want a way out to be freed from the slavery of depression and addiction. That is not harming anyone in any forum. The way is the way of The Sun of Righteousness, which is found in the scriptures that the Jews use and the foundation of Judaism as revealed to me is prohibited by Mr Hsiung for me to post here. It is my great, deep conviction that if I was allowed to post such, that others could be alive today that have died here in one way or the other from psychotropic drugs. You say that I may be harming others. Please do not ever again post anything here that others could have the potential to use me as a scapegoat. I am prohibited by Mr Hsiung to post the historical tactics where Jews were used as a sacapegoat for other's real or imagined ills. This is part of the indoctrination goin' on here and your statements about me here are nothing more than (redacted by respondent) toward me. You say, {if} I. That could lead others to think that there is the possibility that I am and you have not specified such. Please do not post anything that could lead others to think of me in such a way by you using the {if} preface. There is no danger to others by me posting from the Jewish perspective here. I have posted over and over that people can kill themselves and/or others during the withdrawal phase. And I am prohibited from posting here by the prohibitions to me from Mr Hsiung a way that has been revealed to me for those that want the shackles of addiction and depression unlocked. I have not posted here yet how that is accomplished and I have posted over and over that I know of two way to overcome. One by human achievement and the other by divine accomplishment. The prohibitions to me by Mr Hsiung fosters an indoctrination here along with what you wrote about me that could lead others here to disregard what I could say and induce hostile and disagreeable feelings toward me here. By you leaving out the statements that you say I said, I can not defend and my reputation is harmed. Mr Hsiung is allowing you to write what you wrote here about me which could mean that others could think that what you posted here about me is supportive which could put me in harms way to be a victim of antisemitic violence thinking that I am harming people by what I write. The people that have drugged their children by coming here and reading what is allowed, did not have my perspective that is prohibited here by Mr Hsiung. What if they had my perspective to include in their decision as to drug their child or not? Would that be harmful?
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:1029274
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1031550.html