Posted by Lou PIlder on November 18, 2012, at 9:47:25
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-juzehyliddlebhit, posted by Dinah on October 24, 2012, at 16:47:03
> Lou, you've just accused me of being like fascists. Do you in any way expect me to sympathize with you over this? Nothing Bob said to you was nearly as bad as what you said to me.
D,
Please do not post here statements about me that you say that I wrote about you when you do not specify what the statements are. By you leaving out the statemets in question, I do not have the opportunity to post a response to what you wrote about me. I do not know of a post by me that has the statements in it that you write here that I posted. Because you did not identify the statements, people could have hostile feelings induced toward me or disagreeable feelings against me. This could IMHO arouse antisemitic feelings toward me on the basis that Mr Hsiung is allowing you to post what you have about me here.
The reasoning here is that Mr Hsiung is allowing what could decrease the respect or regard held of me by allowing you to post the unspecified statements that you say that I have posted about you for I see nothing about {fascists} in the post that you linked to that I posted. And you say that I {just} posted such.
This is consistant with the other posts in this thread and others that have hatred posted toward me that is allowed by Mr Hsiung. I believe that the hatred posted here toward me comes from the following two posts and other posts that have antisemitic statements that are allowed to stand here by Mr Hsiung.
In this post,(A) hatred toward the Jews (redacted by respondent) to this day. The post is seen as being supportive here for there is no sanction to the post and the rule here by Mr Hsiung is that support takes precedence and not to post anything that could lead one to feel put down/accused. So by the nature of the post being unsanctioned, others could think that it is supportive by the administration of the forum.
There is much more to the post than can be seen which is another subject in and of itself. The statements in the post could arouse hostile feelings toward Jews wherever it is read.
And then in this post,(B), Judaism is insulted and so are people of the Islamic faith, and so are others that fall in the catagory of those in the second list as in #5 in that list.
By the nature that it is allowed to stand, there is the potential for some others to have (false) feelings of superiority over Jews and the others and if they are taking mind-altering drugs given to them by a psychiatrist/doctor, there is the potential that homocidal thinking could be increased by the drug and a Jew could be made a target of hate and be targeted for murder. I base this on the historical record where the community leader allowed these type of statements toward Jews as being what would be good for that community , or county, as a whole. You see, when people are in a community that allows antisemitic statemewnts to be thought that those statements will be good for the community as a whole, you have what is known as anti-Judaism, and is state-sponsored, so people in those type of communities could think that they are doing good by showing hate toward Jews and even killing them.
Lou
(A)
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20040729/msgs/378930.html(B)
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041109/msgs/428781.html
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:1029274
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1031499.html