Posted by Lou PIlder on November 19, 2012, at 7:23:02
In reply to Lou's reply-ahntiegwdehyizm » 10derheart, posted by Lou PIlder on November 18, 2012, at 20:00:47
> > I object.
> >
> > I never indoctrinated anyone here, Lou. It's patently absurd.
> >
> > I am sorry you think this and feel the need to make such uncivil statements.
>
> 10,
> An indoctrination occurs when a perspective by one member is prohibited from being posted. An indoctrination could also occure if the one that can control the content does not act on a statement and allows it to stand.
> The deputies have functions to sanction a statement and if tey do not, then an indoctrination could be fosterd, for the deputy can act on their own because there are statements by the former deputies that state that an appeal to Mr Hsiung could be made in relation to action of sanctioning by the deputy.
> I see the administration here as one entity consisting of Mr Hsiung and his deputy now. Previosly, I see the admin as Mr Hsiung and his former deputies. I consider any antisemitic statement that is allowed to stand when the previous deputies were active to be allowed to stand by all of the deputies at the time the statement was posted. So an indoctrination can occur by inaction by the deputy.
> What is more disturbing is that there are years of outstanding requests concerning posts and outstanding notifications that are not acted on by not only Mr Hsiung but also the deputies of the time that the post was notified by me. Now Mr Hsiung saysthat deputies d not have to act, but that does not mean that they can't act if they want to, as far as I know from the TOS here. This does bring up that there could be unbeknownst to me some other reason as to why all he deputies also have allowed my notifications to be outstanding when they have authorization in the TOS to act if they want to.
> The prohibitions to me here keep the Jewish perspective as revealed to me from being posted.This fosters an indoctrination here because Mr Hsiung does not allow me to post that here. If deputies do not post an objection to that prohibition, I consider them to be part of the indoctrination. I do remember one deputy that objected to that. Was it you?
> Lou10,
Now you say that you never indoctrinated anyone here. The indoctrination happens by you having the ability to control the content by either allowing or not allowing what is civil and/or supportive here by the authority authorized to you by Mr Hsiung. I believe that you had a {duty} to act to prevent antisemitic statements from being allowed to stand because by the nature of that they are allowed to stand, others could think that the statement is supportive and civil here. That leads to an indoctrination at least to those easily swayed, or the {less-confident} member that Mr Hsiung says exist here. And could there not be members here so easily indoctrinated that are even less than a {less-confident} member that could think that they are superior to Jews and that Jews could be sterotyped by the following post?
One of the definitions of antisemitism is that a Jew or Jews are stereotyped as being {demonized}. The following post is still allowed to stand fanning the flames of hatred toward me as a Jew here. By the nature that the statement is allowed to stand, members could think that it is civil an supportive and will be good for this community as a whole. And members could think that they have a duty to try and trust Mr Hsiung in that by him allowing the statement to stand, it will be good for this community as a whole. The deputies had the opportunity to sanction the post as far as I know. Were you a deputy at the time this was posted? I am defamed and the defamation is allowed to stand to this day and no deputy has ever (redacted by respondent). Would you be willing to post here why you have not acted on that post if you were a duputy when it was posted? I am not evil. I have come here to save lives and release people from the prison of addiction and depression. That is not evil in any forum. The revelation that I would post if the prohibitions were not made to me here would come from a Jewish perspective as revealed to me. That is prohibited by Mr Hsiung to me and that is part of the indoctrination here. And by leaving the post in question to stand, that further leads people to belive in that what is in quesation is supportive here and leads people to decrease the respect or regard to me as a Jew here that is allowed to stand as you see it in this link provided here.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041012/msgs/407077.html
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:1030126
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1031548.html