Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply-ahntiegwdehyizm » 10derheart

Posted by Lou PIlder on November 18, 2012, at 20:00:47

In reply to Re: Lou's reply-hahmahz » Lou PIlder, posted by 10derheart on November 18, 2012, at 19:30:52

> I object.
>
> I never indoctrinated anyone here, Lou. It's patently absurd.
>
> I am sorry you think this and feel the need to make such uncivil statements.

10,
An indoctrination occurs when a perspective by one member is prohibited from being posted. An indoctrination could also occure if the one that can control the content does not act on a statement and allows it to stand.
The deputies have functions to sanction a statement and if tey do not, then an indoctrination could be fosterd, for the deputy can act on their own because there are statements by the former deputies that state that an appeal to Mr Hsiung could be made in relation to action of sanctioning by the deputy.
I see the administration here as one entity consisting of Mr Hsiung and his deputy now. Previosly, I see the admin as Mr Hsiung and his former deputies. I consider any antisemitic statement that is allowed to stand when the previous deputies were active to be allowed to stand by all of the deputies at the time the statement was posted. So an indoctrination can occur by inaction by the deputy.
What is more disturbing is that there are years of outstanding requests concerning posts and outstanding notifications that are not acted on by not only Mr Hsiung but also the deputies of the time that the post was notified by me. Now Mr Hsiung saysthat deputies d not have to act, but that does not mean that they can't act if they want to, as far as I know from the TOS here. This does bring up that there could be unbeknownst to me some other reason as to why all he deputies also have allowed my notifications to be outstanding when they have authorization in the TOS to act if they want to.
The prohibitions to me here keep the Jewish perspective as revealed to me from being posted.This fosters an indoctrination here because Mr Hsiung does not allow me to post that here. If deputies do not post an objection to that prohibition, I consider them to be part of the indoctrination. I do remember one deputy that objected to that. Was it you?
Lou

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou PIlder thread:1030126
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1031530.html