Posted by Lou Pilder on March 3, 2009, at 8:08:17
In reply to Re: Lou's response {{{{{Lou}}}}} (nm), posted by fayeroe on February 28, 2009, at 13:41:47
Friends,
I would like for interested members to examine the fallacies listed in the link here.
These fallacies then could be known to you, if they are now unbeknownst to you, and if you see them in arguments put forth here, then you could have a better understanding IMO of the issues that concern me here in relation to the allowing of statements to stand here that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or to lead a Jew to feel put down/accused without there being a notation by the administration that the statements in question are not civil. You could also have a better understanding IMO of what the issues are in parallel threads here and if you would like to see the statements in questionj you could email me if you like.
Some of the fallacies that I would like you to read is the fallacy of {changing the subject} and {appeal to force} and the fallacy of {quoting out of context}. You may want to do a separate search for {quoting out of context}.
Lou
http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:306703
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20090302/msgs/883473.html