Posted by Lou Pilder on February 3, 2009, at 10:06:23
In reply to Lou's reply-nohoazch? » Dinah, posted by Lou Pilder on February 1, 2009, at 12:07:40
> > > At this time, if you could post your opinions, if anyone has them, here after reading this post, then I think that I could have a better understanding of what Dinah is wanting to mean by using your opinions and then respond accordingly.
> >
> > This is what Dr. Bob agreed was in violation of civility guidelines.
> >
> > > Could then a member ask others to post what they consider to be {fact} about what a poster means by their post?
> >
> > It would also be a violation of the site's civility guidelines to ask other posters to post what they consider to be fact about another poster's posts.
>
> Dinah,
> I am still unsure about all that this could mean. For instance, you wrote,[...It would be a violation...to {ask other posters} to post what they consider to be fact about another poster's post...]. Now is it that it is the {asking} that is the issue? If so, then could members post what they {believe} about what something in another member's post means if they are not asked by another poster here?
> For instance, could someone post,[...I think that (unnamed poster) meant XXX when he/she posted YYY...]?
> Or in another case, could someone here post,[...Sigmund Freud meant ZZZ in his writing QQQ in his book on dreams...]
> Lou
>Here is a link to a post that I think could be relevant to this discussion.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20061123/msgs/718638.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:306703
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/877787.html