Posted by Lou Pilder on February 1, 2009, at 12:07:40
In reply to Re: Lou's reply-facquvsohpin » Lou Pilder, posted by Dinah on February 1, 2009, at 11:31:16
> > At this time, if you could post your opinions, if anyone has them, here after reading this post, then I think that I could have a better understanding of what Dinah is wanting to mean by using your opinions and then respond accordingly.
>
> This is what Dr. Bob agreed was in violation of civility guidelines.
>
> > Could then a member ask others to post what they consider to be {fact} about what a poster means by their post?
>
> It would also be a violation of the site's civility guidelines to ask other posters to post what they consider to be fact about another poster's posts.Dinah,
I am still unsure about all that this could mean. For instance, you wrote,[...It would be a violation...to {ask other posters} to post what they consider to be fact about another poster's post...]. Now is it that it is the {asking} that is the issue? If so, then could members post what they {believe} about what something in another member's post means if they are not asked by another poster here?
For instance, could someone post,[...I think that (unnamed poster) meant XXX when he/she posted YYY...]?
Or in another case, could someone here post,[...Sigmund Freud meant ZZZ in his writing QQQ in his book on dreams...]
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:306703
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/877511.html