Posted by Lou PIlder on January 31, 2007, at 6:34:01
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to deputy gardenergirl-ezr » Lou PIlder, posted by gardenergirl on January 30, 2007, at 19:23:39
> Never mind, Lou.
>
> I know your concerns are valid to you. But I feel offended when reading your hypotheses about the meaning of my words. I likely would also feel accused were you to express those hypotheses as statements about your beliefs rather than as response choices. That seems like a fuzzy line to me.
>
> gggardenergirl,
You wrote,[...never mind, Lou...].
I am unsure as to what you mean by your use of that idiom to me here. I understand that the idiom,{never mind}, could mean to {not worry}. If I am not to worry, then could I think that there is clarification to my concerns forthcomming? If that is your intent in your use of the idiom to me, could you verify that?
Another connotation of the idiom {never mind}, is to disregard what someone said. Since you posted what is in question as a deputy, if you are saying that your intent in your use of the idiom is for what you posted to be diregarded, I am unsure if you mean just for me to disregard or if you mean that all members here are to disregard.Could you make another post in the thread where you posted the procedure to follow when one does not receive a response from the administrion in regards to a notification, if you mean that all members are to disregard, that you are asking all members to disregard your deputy administrative procedure?
If there could be something else that you mean by the use of {never mind} here to me, could you clarify this? If you could, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:726277
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/728361.html