Posted by Lou PIlder on January 30, 2007, at 20:00:24
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to deputy gardenergirl-ezr » Lou PIlder, posted by gardenergirl on January 30, 2007, at 19:23:39
> Never mind, Lou.
>
> I know your concerns are valid to you. But I feel offended when reading your hypotheses about the meaning of my words. I likely would also feel accused were you to express those hypotheses as statements about your beliefs rather than as response choices. That seems like a fuzzy line to me.
>
> ggGardenergirl,
You wrote,[...were you to expreess.. as statements...]
If I was to express something as a statement, that would be different from expressiog something as a request for clarification.
Sometimes requests for clarification are to {rule out} something and in this case I was hoping to have some things ruled out in order to open up a clearer path in dialog concerning the deepconcern that I have here as to if there are two standards or not.
I guess that in order to determine that, one of the six deputies or Dr. Hsiung could make it simple for me by declaring that they know of my notification or if they can say that there was no notification from me. As of now, I am unsure if any of the deputies or Dr. Hsiung has declared either one and I thought that your innitiation of dialog with me could lead me to having that clarification that I am concerned about here. I guess that I may not ever receive that clarification from the administration that concerns me here and may have to accept that.
Lou
poster:Lou PIlder
thread:726277
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/728235.html