Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's reply to Honore--~con? » Honore

Posted by Lou PIlder on January 31, 2007, at 5:55:11

In reply to Re: Lou's reply to Honore-carabtme?, posted by Honore on January 30, 2007, at 23:34:46

> Lou, I don't know exactly what your concern is.
>
> I am more concerned about trying to help you to communicate with Bob, so that you can resolve your concerns.
>
> So far as I understand them, my judgment about the importance of posts *in the past,* that is, in the archives, but not having been posted on Psychobabble during the recent past, is different from yours.
>
> Ie, I am not concerned about their present-day impact on readers of Psychobabble.
>
> ---note: I define "recent past" as the last six months.
>
> However, I would like to see you be able to resolve your concerns more to *your* satisfaction.
>
> To that end (ie your achieving a better resolution in your own mind, to your concerns), I suggested that you could resend the request to Dr. Bob.
>
> Also, I believe that it is not a double standard for you to resend. This is because sometimes Bob may overlook a request accidentally, or without knowing it. This isn't prejudice, just an honest mistake.
>
> So I thought you might be less worried about the clarification of what gg or Bob meant in prior posts to you, if you were less worried about resending.
>
> Maybe that didn't help. But being of some help was my intention.
>
> Honore
>
Honore,
You wrote,[...I am >not concerned< about {their} present-day impact of readers on Psychobabble...].
I am unsure as to why you are {not concerned} about any present-day impact of some statements that have not been notated as being uncivil here. Could you elaborate some more about what statements are those that you are not concerned about and why you are {not concerned}? Are you not concerned about, for instance, posts that have statements IMO that historically have been used to foster the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings, as to their impact on readers here in relation to them seeing statements of that nature to be allowed to stand without an administrative sanction that they are uncivil? It is my deep conviction that to estinguish any flames of defamation or discrimination that have the potential to be seen toward Jews here, could provide a clearer path to have social justice for all people.
Lou
>

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou PIlder thread:726277
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/728355.html