Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Lou's response t aspectsof deput/.member gg's post

Posted by Lou Pilder on December 6, 2006, at 9:54:40

In reply to Re: Lou's response to-Simple criteria » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on December 6, 2006, at 9:34:36

> >Since that definition now includes ... posting a link to a blog
>
> There's no rule or interpretation of a rule that says one cannot post a link to a blog. Again, the issue is if the material in the blog is civil or not. The blog that Dinah posted about specifically is one that contains material that would be deemed uncivil if posted on the board.
>
> > then for someone to determine before hand if something is uncivil, they could include in their thinking those two criteria, would they not?
>
> I suppose they could, but it seems simpler to me to determine whether the material is civil or not versus trying to apply every example of every decision to one question.
>
> > If anyone can post here as to that they are sure that I can send it to him >without sending it to someone else first<,{and post here what they use to say that they are sure of that}, that is the question that I have here.
>
> I'll take you up on this. Yes, you can send it to Dr. Bob. Frankly, he has no way of knowing whether you sent it to anyone else beforehand or not. And if you simply must have his ruling versus trusting anyone else, I'm certain you can send it to him. I would not expect a reply in the timeframe you seem to prefer, however. My guess is, Dr. Bob asked you to send it to someone else first because he knows he really does not have the time to get to it soon. Also, he supports the use of civility buddies for just this kind of thing.
>
> What am I using to base this statement on? Confidence in my common sense.
>
> > For I am at this time still unsure if Dr. Hsiung has rescinded his request , or if it is a requirement to me, to send it to someone else first before he will review it.
>
> I'm certain it is not a "requirement". I'm certain that if you were to send it to him for review, you would not get in any kind of trouble for sending it or face any administrative action, unless there is some agreement in place between you and Dr. Bob of which I am unaware. I took his post asking you to send it to someone else first as his preference and as advice, not as some new requirement just for you.
>
> > There is a statement here that says that you can, but I do not see where there is a statement that says that the request,or requirement to me to send it to someone else first has been dropped and that they are sure of that and why they are sure.
>
> Stop signs do not also say, "Go" and yet we go anyway when appropriate. I doubt you'll ever see any kind of post "rescinding" his request to you to send it to someone else first.
>
> Is there some reason you don't wish to send it to anyone else first? You've had all this time, afterall.
>
> > What harm, if any, could there be for this to be made clear to me here as to if I have to or not send the request to another first? If anyone thinks that there could be some harm done to someone if that question is answered to me here, could you post in this thread what person(s) it could harm and why?
>
> There would not be any harm to anyone else if someone clarified this to your satisfaction. I doubt that's what could be standing in the way of you getting the clarification you desire.
>
> Hope this helps. I've answered to the best of my ability based on my experience both as a poster and as a deputy. Please consider this response as a response from a deputy trying to help someone understand the rules.
>
> gg

Friends,
In the post above by deputy/member gardenergirl, she writes,[...you can send it to (Dr. Hsiung)..he has no way of knowing if you sent it to someone else beforehand or not...].
I ask,
A. Could not Dr. Hsiung ask me after I send it to him as to if and what person I sent the post to before I sent it to him?
B. If he did, in your opinion, is deputy/member gg's statement to me here, in >any< way whatsoever, a suggestion to me to deceive Dr.Hsiung? If you take the position that it is not, could you post in this thread why you say that it is not?
Then the deputy/member writes,[..I am certain you can send it to him...] I ask,
C. By what authority is seen from the deputy/member to make that >certain<?
Then the deputy/ member writes,[...my guess is...
D I ask, why guess?
Lou

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:706108
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/710836.html