Posted by Lou Pilder on December 5, 2006, at 19:32:42
In reply to There's no such rule » muffled, posted by gardenergirl on December 5, 2006, at 18:47:59
Friends,
It is written here by the deputy/member about a rule. Since it is about a rule here, could the deputy/member be posting about the rule as a deputy or a member or both?
I am also unsure about the new rule here because the deputy/member wrote,[...There is no such rule...you can link to other posts here...others do it all the time...I have no idea why anyone would..it's..spacific...]
But deputy/member Dinah writes that there has been a change when I rejoined the community. She writes that, as I see it, that I can not post content here that shows historical state-sponsored antisemitism.
Now if I was to post a previous post here that depicts state-sponsored antisemitism, then would that be allowed? I am unsure about that.
Dr. Hsiung also has posted toward this and I have requested clarification from him about the new rules.
There is much more to this...
Lou
PS Here is the link of Dinah writing about one change in the rule for posting that I am unsure as to if covers a previous post here. It seems to me that if I can not post content depicting state-sponsored antisemitism, that it could follow,IMO, that I could not post a previous post here that contained the same, does it not?
www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060802/msgs/678294.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:706108
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061202/msgs/710715.html