Posted by Lou Pilder on October 15, 2006, at 12:25:52
In reply to Lou's reply to Alexandra_k » alexandra_k, posted by Lou Pilder on October 15, 2006, at 11:24:02
Alexandra-k,
The question is if Dr. Hsiung is saying that he is requesting or requireing me to ask someone else before I ask him to say if my proposed post is Ok?
Let us look at another aspect to what I am saying here.
In the following post by Dr. Hsiung in the same thread , he replies to me to ask someone else {for an independant perspective}
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/688881.html
Let us look at this post from me to him in the same thread.
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/692103.html
In the above post, there are the questions of my concerns, A-D that I am awaiting a reply from him.
He has replied to me twice the same type of reply in regards to me asking someone else {and then} ask him.
I think that there is the potential IMO to think that he is putting a condition in front of me, but not others, before he will tell me if the proposed post is Ok, for he writes, >{and then}< [ask me {again}], yet the FAQ has no condition, for it says that one can >always< send the proposed post ot him to find out if it is OK. Now >always< means that there is that understanding.
A question now IMO is that could a reasonable person have the potential to think that DR. Hsiung is denying me the equal opportunity of the terms of service here, as defined in his FAQ, by writing to me to ask someone else {and then} send it to him.
There is a test to determine if his asking me that, constitutes discrimination. There is also a test to determine if the dialog by him to me in the thread in question constitutes harassment based upon the repeated statements by him to me to do the same thing, before my concerns to him are replied to such as the ones,[...A-D...] in the post cited here, for I feel that if he could reply to those, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
In {C}. I ask if the policy excludes requests from me for to find out if a post is OK before I submit it, that could be a post from me addressing statements that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings. For his reply to me, to {ask someone else} that could have the potential to cause me, if I have to ask someone else first, to find others that could have a knowlege of that spacific concept.
But the FAQ writes that DR. Hsiung knows it when it can be seen. And others could know it when it is seen also. Which menas that {I} could know it when it could be seen. And if I think it can be seen, then I am asking Dr. Hsiung if he sees it, not if others see it. For I know of others that see it without asking them, and they have published librarys about it.
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:688245
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/695020.html