Posted by AuntieMel on September 28, 2004, at 9:53:41
In reply to Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » AuntieMel, posted by Larry Hoover on September 28, 2004, at 8:55:18
Right Lar. I remember that, and I remember I was on your side then, too. You always have good stuff to contribute, and I thought that the block was way, way, way too long - and that the guy *was* saying things without any studies to back him up.
But there are some major differences:
1) This new rule wouldn't have applied to you then, as your posts weren't consecutive.
<NOTE: Plese Dr. Bob - I'm stating what I remember, not accusing wrongdoing>
2) You were addressing a 'fellow' poster, not admin. This rule doesn't allow for that distinction.3) You were asking for the same bits of information, where in this case there were additional bits of information added each time.
So, while I disagreed about your block, I don't see that making the rules even more restrictive is the answer.
poster:AuntieMel
thread:394224
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/396248.html