Posted by Lou Pilder on September 28, 2004, at 9:30:42
In reply to Re: Lou's response to Auntie Mel-1 of many, posted by SLS on September 28, 2004, at 9:10:40
SLS,
You wrote,[...would be an interesting discussion...].
I agree, for the 3 consecutive rule is dependant on the {consecutivness).
Now I think that if a poster starts off with alerting that there will be many posts to what they are about to post, that evryone that is reading the thread could have the opportunity to not read it , if they are of the group that objects to more than 3 consecutive posts. I have seen posters put the word (long) after their subject line to alert people to have the opportunity to not read if they are of the group that does not like long posts.
So would it not be acceptable here,IYO, for me to write in my subject line, if there is going to be more than 3 posts, (1 of many posts) and that could be a resolution?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:394224
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/396231.html