Dr Bob, the problem seems to be

Posted by saw on September 28, 2004, at 4:03:06

In reply to Re: Above was only supposed to be two posts (nm), posted by AuntieMel on September 27, 2004, at 23:26:39

isolated to the Admin board. If a limit has to be placed, why not restrict it to the Admin board only? The other boards are behaving themselves and are not causing undue distress!
Reconsider? Please?

Thread

Support Toph 9/23/04
...
I can do this all night (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
But I'd really rather not (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
Please? Really. Please? (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
Dr. Bob. You're causing me harm. Please block me. (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts, Dr. Bob daisym 9/27/04
Re: Dr. Bob. You're causing me harm. Please block me. » Dinah crazymaisie 9/27/04
Re: But consider this » Dinah AuntieMel 9/27/04
I'm w/Daisy. Dr. Bob, I think u need to summarize gardenergirl 9/27/04
Re: 48 week block would be too long (nm) » Dinah AuntieMel 9/27/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts AuntieMel 9/27/04
Re: ^^^^Addendum to above Dr. Bob AuntieMel 9/27/04
Re: Above was only supposed to be two posts (nm) AuntieMel 9/27/04
Dr Bob, the problem seems to be saw 9/28/04
How about this idea: partlycloudy 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts SLS 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Dinah Larry Hoover 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Dinah Larry Hoover 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » AuntieMel Larry Hoover 9/28/04
Lou's response to Auntie Mel-1 of many » AuntieMel Lou Pilder 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Larry Hoover SLS 9/28/04
Re: Lou's response to Auntie Mel-1 of many SLS 9/28/04
Re: Interesting points - but..... » SLS AuntieMel 9/28/04
Lou's response to thos ethat want the 3 post rule » Lou Pilder Lou Pilder 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Larry Hoover AuntieMel 9/28/04
Lou's response to SLS » SLS Lou Pilder 9/28/04
...
Re: rules in the FAQ alexandra_k 9/12/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:saw thread:394224
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/396151.html

	for
in