Re: ^^^^Addendum to above Dr. Bob

Posted by AuntieMel on September 27, 2004, at 23:25:41

In reply to Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts, posted by AuntieMel on September 27, 2004, at 23:23:14

The last sentence was to have been deleted.

Thread

Support Toph 9/23/04
...
Please don' t make me actually be uncivil (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
That would make me feel even worse (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
I can do this all night (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
But I'd really rather not (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
Please? Really. Please? (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
Dr. Bob. You're causing me harm. Please block me. (nm) Dinah 9/27/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts, Dr. Bob daisym 9/27/04
Re: Dr. Bob. You're causing me harm. Please block me. » Dinah crazymaisie 9/27/04
Re: But consider this » Dinah AuntieMel 9/27/04
I'm w/Daisy. Dr. Bob, I think u need to summarize gardenergirl 9/27/04
Re: 48 week block would be too long (nm) » Dinah AuntieMel 9/27/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts AuntieMel 9/27/04
Re: ^^^^Addendum to above Dr. Bob AuntieMel 9/27/04
Re: Above was only supposed to be two posts (nm) AuntieMel 9/27/04
Dr Bob, the problem seems to be saw 9/28/04
How about this idea: partlycloudy 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts SLS 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Dinah Larry Hoover 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Dinah Larry Hoover 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » AuntieMel Larry Hoover 9/28/04
Lou's response to Auntie Mel-1 of many » AuntieMel Lou Pilder 9/28/04
Re: limit of 3 consecutive posts » Larry Hoover SLS 9/28/04
Re: Lou's response to Auntie Mel-1 of many SLS 9/28/04
Re: Interesting points - but..... » SLS AuntieMel 9/28/04
Lou's response to thos ethat want the 3 post rule » Lou Pilder Lou Pilder 9/28/04
...
Re: rules in the FAQ alexandra_k 9/12/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:AuntieMel thread:394224
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040927/msgs/396098.html

	for
in