Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ

Posted by gilmourr on September 9, 2012, at 3:15:28

In reply to Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » gilmourr, posted by phidippus on September 8, 2012, at 16:14:01

I'm a bit hesitant to try Pristiq since it is the cleaner version of effexor. Effexor made me have severe chest pains and my BP raised to 165/125'ish.
I could try it, but I'd rather try a stimulant or a TCA. I am really not a fan of SSRI's or SNRI's. They seem to always cause 10x the trouble.

Thread

Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ gilmourr 9/8/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » gilmourr Exister 9/8/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ bleauberry 9/8/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ gilmourr 9/8/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » gilmourr Exister 9/8/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » gilmourr phidippus 9/8/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ gilmourr 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ SLS 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » phidippus SLS 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » SLS phidippus 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » gilmourr phidippus 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ gilmourr 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ gilmourr 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ phidippus 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » phidippus SLS 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ gilmourr 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » SLS phidippus 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ SLS 9/9/12
Re: Nardil 45 mg to 60 mg (worse?) theory. PST PLZ » phidippus SLS 9/9/12
...
Re: atomoxetine » SLS phidippus 9/11/12

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:gilmourr thread:1025112
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20120830/msgs/1025205.html

	for
in