Posted by Martin Johnson on September 6, 2002, at 6:42:51
In reply to *Real* evidence please... » Martin Johnson, posted by JonW on September 6, 2002, at 6:20:49
First of all, I don't see how you can perceive Dr. Day's site to be biased. I was hoping you might take a little more time to thoroughly navigate the site rather than hastily skimming the details. Did you not see the pictures of Dr. Day's tumor? Take another look please. As for pseudo-science, these links do preach a solid scientific foundation. I have piles and piles of documents and links to many websites which correlate efficiently with these previous links I've provided. Also, the reason the majority of the medical world may see things the opposite is because most of them are paid well enough to not even care about what's really happening around them. Please do some real research. If you do you'll end up proving me right. Give this link a look. A report commissioned by the Youth Affairs Network surely shoudn't be so biased. http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5006568%255E2,00.html. Maybe you are a little biased against the information I'm trying to put forth, simply because it does not fit into your current understanding of what you think you know.
Also don't be so quick to discredit someone just because they are trying to sell you Extensive amounts of useful and helpful Information. Try looking at the other links you say you refused to click on.
poster:Martin Johnson
thread:118970
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20020906/msgs/118989.html