![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 15 to 39 of 58. Go back in thread:
Posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 9:04:37
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » pinkeye, posted by fallsfall on May 4, 2005, at 7:40:22
There's a fair amount of thought out there that says once a therapist always a therapist. Because whether your therapist is currently acting as your therapist or not, he's supposed to be acting in your best interests. He's not going to breach confidentiality. In many cases he'll ba available for further therapy. A lot of duties don't stop with the actual relationship.
There are also a lot of sub-categories based on the nature of the therapeutic relationship. Did you go three times to learn breathing techniques? Call once for a consult? Have a long term relationship?
But in the case of a long term therapy relationship, I think the ethical guidelines are spot on. Once a therapist always a therapist.
Think of the complications.
Disapprobation from colleagues.
Having to remember what was said in a therapy setting and what wasn't. Because what was said in therapy is still confidential.
The friendship would really have to start over from scratch, and it would be heavily burdened.
It just doesn't seem like a good basis for friendship.
Incidentally, while supportive therapy does discourage transference (and while it happens anyway) my understanding from the literature is that it in no way equalizes the therapeutic relationship more than exploratory therapy. Maybe the opposite. If you ever read the books on supportive psychotherapy...
Well, I have. And I'm in supportive psychotherapy (long term). And I'm under no illusion that my therapist considers me an equal.
Short term CBT and the like would be the least power differential because it's more like teacher/student.
Posted by Susan47 on May 4, 2005, at 11:18:15
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ?, posted by octavia on May 3, 2005, at 18:55:46
Hmm. Irvin Yalom claims to have treated a friend, something that went on for several years, and he managed to stay friends with her afterwards as well, mingling in the same social circle with their spouses and such. I believe if he can do it can happen and why on earth not? Everything is relative to the people involved and their degree of maturation - always. IMO.
Posted by Susan47 on May 4, 2005, at 11:26:10
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ?, posted by alexandra_k on May 3, 2005, at 23:06:25
What you're writing about here in your post, that's the reason this therapy relationship has to be done in a completely different frame of mind, and why I couldn't ever be a therapist. I'd be always denying myself, always denying my real feelings, so much of my life's journey would be spent alone in my head, or having the necessity to rehash things constantly, take every dynamic in a relationship and turn it around until I've viewed it from every angle possible, to make sure I wasn't hurting someone or being hurt myself. And when I wasn't doing that adequately, then there'd be the guilt of not wanting to, wondering, well what is it about this person that bugs me so much? And then, if I couldn't work with someone for whatever reason, having to tell them that, somehow.
And then there's the necessity of having the respect of my peers. That's another story entirely. Because no matter what, I need that. That would be my biggest probable need.
In many ways, therapist is a lousy profession. IMO.
Posted by Susan47 on May 4, 2005, at 11:36:18
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » alexandra_k, posted by Susan47 on May 4, 2005, at 11:26:10
And add to all of that stuff the fact that psychotherapy is evolving rapidly (???)
and there're always new considerations, new circumstances, it's like law, you know, there's always a new precedent, isn't there? New case law, and of course if you don't do your research you don't know it exists, so you argue your case without the benefit of the knowledge and you lose. Or you go in well-prepared and you might win.
I don't know.
I just don't really know anything about so much of this stuff.
Posted by Shortelise on May 4, 2005, at 12:12:01
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ?, posted by happyflower on May 3, 2005, at 21:20:49
Am I nuts (well, yes) or didn't you say before that you are very sexually attracted to your T?
ShortE
Posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 12:22:35
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » happyflower, posted by Shortelise on May 4, 2005, at 12:12:01
> Am I nuts (well, yes) or didn't you say before that you are very sexually attracted to your T?
>
> ShortEIf you are talking about me, than yes I thought their was some mutual sexual attraction. But I feel I have moved on from that, yes he is attractive, but do I want him, no. I want my DH.
Posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 12:34:06
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » happyflower, posted by Shortelise on May 4, 2005, at 12:12:01
Ok Guys.. I see all of your point.
I guess that is why it is generally not encouraged for a T to be friends with a former patient.But actually what I was getting to, was the fact about cutting off ALL contact after therapy is over. Even this, in most cases, (like short term therapy, specific issue related therapy etc) is probably advisable not to encourage any contact after Termination.
But what I was getting to is, above and beyond all these rules and regulations and quesiton about power dynamics in relationship, at the end of the day, both the T and the patient are human beings. And they just have emotional needs. To tell a patient that after termination, he/she has to completely cut off contact with a T (who during the course of therapy serves as the most closest person to this patient) is wrong. If the therapist decides personally, that further contact with him/her is most likely to damage the client further, or if the therapist doesn't like to see him/her in the role of a friend or detested the patient to startwith, by all means, he/she should'nt encourage contact, ie, if the patient was being a complete nuisance to him/her, or he/she personally didn't like the patient and was just waiting to get the therapy over with. I don't advocate the therapist playing a role of a therapist in the name of friendship. But what I am trying to say is that the decision should be left to the therapist's common sense and the patients common sense and not make that a rule.
To my mind, it is incredibly cruel, to have a patient completely open up and get attached to you, and then one day just ask the patient to stop contacting you and forget that you ever existed in his/her life. It is just not human.
Actually, the whole therapy model is based on religious and other social models which take humanity into account and are more humane. In church, people go to counselling to the pastors, and they go to make confessions. And that is what served as a starting point for this whole therapy business. To just take that part of it and apply it half way, but without understanding the deeper meaning behind it is wrong. The deeper meaning in therapy, is the relief that the client gets from bonding closely with another human being. That is what helps. That is why more humane therapists are always more successful than brillian and sharp and otherwise un empathetical therapists. What the patient really needs is the love and care and afffection and the bond. In my mind, the current western model of therapy, takes the humanity out of the picture.Just my 2 cents.
Posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 12:40:41
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » Shortelise, posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 12:34:06
I think in almost all relationships of all kinds there are different levels of power. I also believe we trasfer our feelings to other people all the time. I think most relationships there is not equal power all the time. It changes all the time.
Posted by gardenergirl on May 4, 2005, at 14:00:37
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » Shortelise, posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 12:34:06
>But what I am trying to say is that the decision should be left to the therapist's common sense and the patients common sense and not make that a rule.Actually, there is NO rule that says a T must cut off all contact with clients after termination. It IS left up to the T within whatever constraints may be in place due to a situation. For example, it might be the policy of the agency, in which case the T has no choice. In other cases, the rule is that copies of all correspondence or contact must be placed in the client file, and that might lead a T to discourage contact.
But a T in independent practice, or one who does not have agency policy limiting them, can certainly choose to allow contact after termination. We actually discussed this in one class, and the professor stated her own policy. She tells former clients that they are free to contact her in the future, but that she may not necessarily respond. She frames this as how she always likes to hear how former clients are doing, but she is not always able to respond in a timely manner due to her workload. So with this knowledge in place, she leaves it up to the client.
And I have received emails from former clients in the past. I deal with them on an individual basis depending on the nature of the email.
But at any rate, there is no rule in the APA ethcial code that says contact MUST end at termination. Most states ethical codes or state laws are based on APA.
gg
Posted by Susan47 on May 4, 2005, at 14:08:42
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » Shortelise, posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 12:34:06
Add into the mix you've described the fact that if a therapist really doesn't like a patient or can't handle his or her behaviour, s/he hasn't dealt with it very effectively if s/he has to terminate therapy in order to feel better. Sounds like a therapist who gives a termination that's hurtful to the patient, isn't very good at the job s/he just did. So there you go, more for him or her to feel angry about. It must be a relief to be rid of troublesome client. Yes, I would hate the job. Hate it.
Posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 15:35:26
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » pinkeye, posted by Susan47 on May 4, 2005, at 14:08:42
i actually don't think that a T would necessarily have to be bad to terminate.
in lots of circumstances, that may end up doing long run good for both of them.
I think Ts should get equal privilege - just as we as patients get to choose, they also should be able to choose.my next 2 cents. ignore if it triggers please.
Posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 17:48:33
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » Shortelise, posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 12:34:06
Well, you won't get me to disagree with that.
It's incredibly disrespectful of the relationship that therapist and client have worked to build together.
But there's a big difference between keeping contact and starting a friendship.
Besides, I always figure I get the best part of my therapist anyway.
Posted by JenStar on May 4, 2005, at 18:21:36
In reply to Is it really harmful to be friends with T ?, posted by happyflower on May 3, 2005, at 10:35:29
I think it hurts most of all to realize that the T may not WANT to be our friend after therapy is over. Even if it's not explicitly forbidden, and even if WE want to be friends, the T just may have no desire to do it.
Part of the process of good therapy is becoming dependent and trusting the T, which are things we normally do with good friends. It's very hard to come to terms with the fact that for the T, the relationship isn't really "friendship" the way we like to define it -- it's something else entirely. (Without the $$....no therapy!)
We have only one T, but the T has many many clients...to us, the T is a huge part of our world. But to the T, we are just one of many. I believe that good T's do care about each patient individually, just the way a good doctor cares about each patient in a practice or hospital. But how draining it would be, how impossible, for the T to form a 'real' friendship with each client who wanted it.
Anyway, I think in VERY special cases a friendship may develop on its own. But in that case, the T would easily figure out a way to stay "friends." If we have to ask this kind of question, I think it already means that the T is just not interested in such a relationship.
Just my 2 cents! Hope it didn't offend...
JenStar
Posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 18:36:06
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » happyflower, posted by JenStar on May 4, 2005, at 18:21:36
I know I'm not one of many to my therapist. I'm the one and only Dinah. Special down to my toes.
I imagine that's true of long term therapy relationships in general.
It's hard for me to comprehend friendship being better than therapy.
Posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 19:37:49
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » happyflower, posted by JenStar on May 4, 2005, at 18:21:36
I think it is true.. The thing that hurts the most is the fact that your T does not want to know you after the termination. That is the hardest part - more than the fact that you could not be friends, is the fact that your T doesn't want it that is hard to digest.
In many cases, it is not really about money. My ex T didn't charge me for any of the services. So I know it is not about money. Maybe it has to do with interest.
Posted by JenStar on May 4, 2005, at 20:21:40
In reply to Is friendship supposed to be better?, posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 18:36:06
I'm sure you're special to everyone in your life, Dinah, not just your T . :)
I think friendship isn't necessarily better, as long as you have good boundaries, which you def. seem to have with your T. I've never heard you express sexual/romantic feelings for him, and you seem very clear about expectations on both ends. So for you it seems that the relationship is very healthy and solid, and you like it the way it is.
It seems that some people have a much harder time setting up those kind of groundrules in their mind. I know a lot of people really seem to desire a closer relationship with the T, maybe the kind where they get to offer advice/support in kind, get and are are given affection, and share the kind of emotional bond that seems to come with friendship. Maybe it's because it's hard to "get" that someone who sees the "real us" isn't magnetically drawn to us; doesn't go crazy trying to find a way to be with us all the time. After all, if we're so great (which we're learning to feel about ourselves), why isn't the T breaking down doors to be our friend? Anyway, that's the way it would go in MY mind, I think!
I admire the kind of relationship you have with your T. I think it's really a good role-model of what the healthy client/T relationship looks like!
take care,
jenStar
Posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 20:32:03
In reply to Re: Is friendship supposed to be better? » Dinah, posted by JenStar on May 4, 2005, at 20:21:40
> Maybe it's because it's hard to "get" that someone who sees the "real us" isn't magnetically drawn to us; doesn't go crazy trying to find a way to be with us all the time. After all, if we're so great (which we're learning to feel about ourselves), why isn't the T breaking down doors to be our friend? Anyway, that's the way it would go in MY mind, I think!
Ahhhh. Ok, that I understand. I guess I assume it's because he's so darned delighted to be my therapist (wink) that he couldn't bear to leave that behind. :)
>
> I admire the kind of relationship you have with your T. I think it's really a good role-model of what the healthy client/T relationship looks like!
>
> take care,
> jenStarThanks JenStar. I've always thought it works so well precisely because I have no further desires from him. So I do understand that.
I suppose I'm a bit hampered by the fact that I'm very skilled at wanting what's possible to have, and pretty much never noticing if on the odd chance I actually want something more.
Posted by Shortelise on May 4, 2005, at 20:41:14
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ?, posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 12:22:35
Yes, Happyflower - I was talking to you. I did remember correctly that you had written about a strong sexual attraction to your T, and wondered how it would translate into friendship. I have found that mutual sexual attraction to men outside my marriage, esp. the men in couples my husband and I frequent socially, has meant Trouble.
But as you say, you've moved on. It would be great to live in a small town where seeing my T out and about, talking about the weather, watching his children grow, etc. was a part of things. I would like that, I think. But I don't think I could be friends with him, nor could my husband. But long term therapy is different. I could probably be friends or at least socialize with the woman I did art therapy with for six months.
Not so weel today so can't read what everyone else has written but will do so later.
ShortE
Posted by Shortelise on May 4, 2005, at 20:41:39
In reply to Is friendship supposed to be better?, posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 18:36:06
good point, DInah
Posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 20:57:30
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » happyflower, posted by Shortelise on May 4, 2005, at 20:41:14
I guess I don't get away with anything here! lol There is still some attraction going on at both ends, but I truely believe they won't amount into anything. Maybe a friendship wouldn't be a good idea then. I guess I need to get out and meet some friends before I end therapy so I won't feel the loss so much.
Is short term therapy different than long term? I have only had about 12 sessions and he says I should be done in a couple of months, is that considered short term?
I guess if friendship isn't in the cards, I will be here with everyone trying to get over the loss.
Posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 21:02:43
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » Shortelise, posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 20:57:30
I like your easy going attitude Happyflower. I remember you having a very bad childhood. Inspite of that you have grown to be so humorous. :-)
I like it.
Pinkeye.
Posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 21:36:15
In reply to Re: Is friendship supposed to be better? » JenStar, posted by Dinah on May 4, 2005, at 20:32:03
It could work the other way also... Ah he knows so much about me, and he knows all the ugly details about my life, that he must truly hate me. Nobody could like me after knowing me fully. I think it depends on how you perceive yourself.
I have felt both ways many times.
> > Maybe it's because it's hard to "get" that someone who sees the "real us" isn't magnetically drawn to us; doesn't go crazy trying to find a way to be with us all the time. After all, if we're so great (which we're learning to feel about ourselves), why isn't the T breaking down doors to be our friend? Anyway, that's the way it would go in MY mind, I think!
>
> Ahhhh. Ok, that I understand. I guess I assume it's because he's so darned delighted to be my therapist (wink) that he couldn't bear to leave that behind. :)
>
> >
> > I admire the kind of relationship you have with your T. I think it's really a good role-model of what the healthy client/T relationship looks like!
> >
> > take care,
> > jenStar
>
> Thanks JenStar. I've always thought it works so well precisely because I have no further desires from him. So I do understand that.
>
> I suppose I'm a bit hampered by the fact that I'm very skilled at wanting what's possible to have, and pretty much never noticing if on the odd chance I actually want something more.
>
>
Posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 22:19:37
In reply to Re: Is friendship supposed to be better? » Dinah, posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 21:36:15
> It could work the other way also... Ah he knows so much about me, and he knows all the ugly details about my life, that he must truly hate me. Nobody could like me after knowing me fully. I think it depends on how you perceive yourself.
>
> >
You know we talked about this a little bit during our last session. I was talking about how shameful I felt of my family growing up. And thats one of the reasons I didn't tell anyone about my mothers abuse. Even during adulthood, most people do look at you weird if you were abused. It is like they think something must be wrong with you or something. My T asked me if I thought he thought that about me. I said no, because he was a T and wasn't supposed to think that. He said well what if I was something else. I don't know what he was getting at because I ran off on another tangent.
Posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 22:20:57
In reply to Re: Is it really harmful to be friends with T ? » happyflower, posted by pinkeye on May 4, 2005, at 21:02:43
Posted by Dinah on May 5, 2005, at 3:08:40
In reply to Re: Is friendship supposed to be better?, posted by happyflower on May 4, 2005, at 22:19:37
You ought to bring it up again. :) I suspect it's important.
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Psychology | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.