Posted by alexandra_k on August 2, 2010, at 7:43:33
In reply to Re: Why Is Babble Not Babbling?, posted by Dr. Bob on August 2, 2010, at 0:57:35
> Yes, if posters didn't want Ron to be blocked, they could've acted.
Some did. Some acted by attempting to tell you to stoppit. I realize that we didn't act in the way that YOU wanted, but act, we did.
> Whether or not they thought the block would've been justified.
The above course of action (trying to get you to stoppit) seems most fitting for someone who doesn't believe that your action of blocking him is justified - don't you think?
> Other posters didn't try to help him avoid a block
Please don't jump to conclusions. Can't you see how these conversations with you are posters attempting to help posters not be blocked? Can't you take some responsibility for the efficacy (or inefficacy) of that strategy?
> and I blocked him. I take responsibility for blocking him
Indeed. Then you jump to conclusions about our behavior here:
> and I see other posters as responsible for not trying to help him avoid the block.
> Maybe Babble isn't babbling because people see posters not trying to help each other avoid blocks.
And you wonder why babblers aren't babbling... Do you really not see???
PBC... INdeed.
poster:alexandra_k
thread:956448
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20100716/msgs/956847.html