Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: Lou's lawsuit-Lou's response

Posted by Lou Pilder on September 6, 2016, at 15:52:57

In reply to Re: Lou's lawsuit, posted by Tabitha on September 6, 2016, at 14:37:36

> > You see, unbeknownst to you and others, I am going to appear to the high court in Ohio on Sept 28 as the commission justices have invited me to argue a religious discrimination charge that I have made as Jews are being discriminated upon as I am the charging party.
> I couldn't resist checking out this important legal case. Lou complained to his condo board because there were holiday wreaths in the complex. Presumably, he didn't get justice there, so he filed a complaint to the Ohio civil rights commission, saying the the display of wreaths is discrimination against Jewish people.
> On May 19, 2016, the Ohio Civil Rights Commission dismissed his case as "No Probable Cause."
> On June 9, 2016, he filed a "Request for Reconsideration Vacate Original No Probable Cause Finding and Grant for Further Review"
> What a nuisance!
> Friends,
This is the only case like it in the U.S. The original finding of NPC was set aside and then the commissioners after hearing from me personally and also hearing from the board's lawyer will make a determination that will be far reaching.
As of now, since my request for reconsideration was granted, there is then the aspect that there is probable cause. That is what the hearing will be for.
Each side gets 5 minuets and then the commissioners ask questions to make their determination and vote.
This will be held at Dennison University near Columbus, Ohio and those that want to see me show what religious discrimination does in a community, are invited. I am up against a high profile Cincinnati lawyer and my only legal training is that I watched a few TV episodes of Perry Mason as a child.
But I have already had his argument set aside in my first rebut. So I think that I can also show at the hearing that a finding of intentional religious discrimination is to be found.
The important thing is that the ruling will set a standard for equality in religion. Now this involves the Fair Housing Act in 3604 a-c that I can transfer to sites like this that are open to the public. This is not only a Fair Housing issue, but also precedent to what constitutes religious discrimination. That is why this case is so important that the commission reversed the no probable cause and set aside the association's argument. I consider the case to be equivalent to Dread Scott and Brown vs Topeka.
For those that want to see me bring justice to not only Jews that have to suffer the humiliation of discrimination that puts them in bondage to someone else's hate, come to the hearing and I think that you will go out in joy, and say thank God almighty, I am free at last.




Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post

Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.


Start a new thread

Google www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:Lou Pilder thread:1091711