Posted by Lou Pilder on June 17, 2013, at 21:06:26
In reply to Re: the Prince of Death, posted by Dr. Bob on May 9, 2013, at 21:46:30
> > > So be it as it may be, let us look at the following post here by Mr Hsiung about me.
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1043225.html
> > >
> > > Lou
> >
> > Although not explicitly referring to you, it was an unfortunate choice of words.
> >
> > - Scott
>
> I was referring to depression, not to Lou. And "The Wizard of Babble" was referring to, of all things, feeling powerless (while being seen as powerful).
>
> Bob
Mr. Hsiung,
You wrote,[...I was referring to depression, not to Lou...].
I do not read it that way. I read it as it can be seen. And I know it when it can be seen and others can know it also. I can not see that The Prince of Death is anything but an epithet for me, as it is plainly visible because that is what the context is in Sukarno's post. I do not see how anyone could see what is not there. If you intended to mean what is not there, then could you not have posted that originally? If not, why not?
In Sukarno's post, we see:
Lou said
he sanctioned others
he can't be sanctioned because he is not accountable
The {he} is me, as can be seen. The Prince of Death can be seen as an epithet for me. I am the subject person as to what I had posted. What is posted is what can be sanctioned. People can be accountable.
Now you say that you take responsibility for what you post. Regardless of your later explanation, there was harm to me by the use of the Epithet toward me here. The {Prince of Death}oould be thought as a perversion of {The Prince of Peace} since I have posted using that in some of my posts.
Here is Sukarno's post
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20120228/msgs/1030301.html
Someone greater than me may see this as I see it, as it can be seen.
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:1042981
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20130109/msgs/1045464.html