Posted by Lou Pilder on January 20, 2011, at 19:46:51
In reply to Lou's reminder-dhelbhndf, posted by Lou Pilder on January 10, 2011, at 19:41:21
> > DR. Hsiung,
> > Your reply was,[...will..respond..by posting in the thread or replying directly...]
> > My question that your reply to me was,[...could you offer another way that an answer could be given if Dr. Hsiung and the deputies do not reply...].
> > Are you saying any of the following?
> > A. There are no requests from you to us that we have either not posted a reply or replied directly to you with an answer to your question.
> > B. We will uphold our policy here and you can send the many posts that you requested for us to address or reply to you that we have been unwilling to provide an answer to, again to us, and we will either post in the thread or reply to you directly with an answer to your request.
> > C. The posts, that in your opinion, have the potential to foster antisemitic feelings by the nature of those posts, in your opinion, not being sanctioned as other posts that accuse or put down others, or are not sensitive to the feelings of others, will remain as they are and we will not post that they are uncivl or not supportive, in the thread or reply directly to you about them.
> > D. You can have another use the report feature (in your behalf} and we will respond to others making requests in your behalf, even in relation to those posters that I have made a rule of 3 that will expell you from the community if you ask about their posts.
> > E. I am not requiring that you ask someone first before you request that I determine in advance if a post is acceptable to be posted and you can disregard my previous request to you to do that.
> > F. I will appoint a deputy of your choice to review each and every post that in your opinion has the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings that are not notated by us to be uncivil, and they will post a note of some nature to show that the administration does not consider the statement in question to be civil and/or supportive.( I am not asking that the poster be sanctioned)
> > G. In your request for {another way} to have your requests answered, there is none, so those posts that in your opinion have the potential to foster defamation toward Jews and you as a Jew here, we will not revisit and they will be allowed to stand.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In regards to your reminder procedure, the above.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
In regards to your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
Yet today, I have more concerns. Concerns about being a victim of antisemitic violence, and other concerns. If you could post answers to the requests of mine here, I could have the opportunity to seek a different remedy while the requests remain outstanding.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:698749
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20110117/msgs/977548.html