Psycho-Babble Administration | about the operation of this site | Framed
This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | List of forums | Search | FAQ

Re: a recent sequence... » twinleaf

Posted by gardenergirl on January 21, 2009, at 22:24:06

In reply to a recent sequence..., posted by twinleaf on January 21, 2009, at 13:52:30

> ...(all the more shocking because it was made by a mental health professional). ...There can be a degree of hurt in posted comments which simply cannot be rectified or atoned for in notifications.

> December [22] Gardenergirl: (to me) "perhaps you might benefit from doing work on cognitive distortion."

Twinleaf, I apologize to you for that comment. Though I truly didn't intend for it to be hurtful, I can see how it was, and I regret causing you pain. Looking at it now, I can see that it came from a frustrated place in me and seems more likely to be about trying to alleviate my own frustration versus anyone else's feelings.

If I had the opportunity for a mulligan, I might instead merely post a list of common cognitive biases/distortions and possibly how to challenge them, as in the material on these two pages: http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=9747&cn=353 and
http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=9748&cn=353
That approach leaves it up to you and/or anyone else reading to think it relevant or not and to do with that information what they will.

As to your statement about a post coming from a "mental health professional", my very first thought was that it isn't relevant. Then I realized that any label one applies to another can come with a set of expectations and/or assumptions about behavior and intentions related to the label. How much one believes in those expectations/assumptions can vary certainly, so perhaps it could be relevant, at least in as far as feeling shocked by a message. On the other hand, I think that a mental health professional might be more more likely to be familiar with the construct of congntive biases/distortions and thus might be more likely to bring it up as a hypothesis than someone who has not been exposed to the construct. At any rate, all of that seems secondary, at least to me, to whether or not the label/assumption is even accurate, which is personal information I no longer disclose on this site.

Regards,

gg

 

Thread

 

Post a new follow-up

Your message only Include above post


Notify the administrators

They will then review this post with the posting guidelines in mind.

To contact them about something other than this post, please use this form instead.

 

Start a new thread

 
Google
dr-bob.org www
Search options and examples
[amazon] for
in

This thread | Show all | Post follow-up | Start new thread | FAQ
Psycho-Babble Administration | Framed

poster:gardenergirl thread:875301
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20081228/msgs/875363.html