Posted by Happyflower on June 12, 2007, at 18:40:31
In reply to A cognitive exercise in challenging assumptions » Happyflower, posted by gardenergirl on June 12, 2007, at 16:45:11
Well if it wasn't about me, I expected a short answer no, not a whole list of avoidance of not answering my question and a I am not going to read any more of your posts from another poster.
So if it wasn't about me, why not just say it, who it the f*ck you fairy?
It seems like a select group knows who you are talking about, and the responsed in regard to your "poem" did make references to babble chat. Plus the only one in chat, and I am there a lot, I am the only one that has ever said, f*ck you on the boards.So why not just answer the question? If this kind of thing is posted publically and not privately as a way to vent, then I think we should be able to ask who you are refering to and why.
But not aswering my question, does draw conclusions.
If someone who came to me wondering if I wast talking about them in a negative way, and I wasn't, I would be very sure they were told that it wasn't about them.
But the lack of answer actually probably answers my question.
ISo why can't you answer?
poster:Happyflower
thread:762684
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070605/msgs/762735.html