Posted by Lou Pilder on November 12, 2006, at 19:41:25
In reply to Locking the posts in the past, posted by zazenducky on November 12, 2006, at 15:08:40
Friends,
It is written here,[...if the administrator's wish is to leave posts that are not on the last page {in the past},then maybe it should be made so that those posts can not be posted to...].
I could offer even another suggestion if it is the adnministrator's wish to have posts in the past and posts in the present. That could be to have only one page and whatever is not on the one page, it is in the past and can not ever be seen again.
But people read the posts here in the present and what they are reading, they are presently reading.
There is something here that I have not posted about yet. It is about {establishment}. This is one reason why I am wanting the posts in question to be notated in some way as uncivil. For if they are not, it is my great fear that what is uncivil could be thought by some to be civil and be {established} as so.
This concept of {establishment} came out of the French Revolution and the U.S. Constitution. In 1947 a monumental determination that reverberated throughout the world was spoken. What was spoken then still stands today. In 1954 another milestone was achieved. There have been many more determinations since then that echo the same warning. I ask:For what good and just reason(s) could be given to allow uncivil statements to not be notated as uncivil? This is a different questin from the previous, for in this question, I am asking for both good and just causes.)
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:702458
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/702978.html