Posted by Lou Pilder on November 12, 2006, at 5:17:28
In reply to Re: Lou's response to aspects ofGlydin's post-red, posted by Jost on November 12, 2006, at 1:53:47
Friends,
It is written here,[...{old} posts..past in the past..didn't want to go back..and bring them into the present..new designations on old posts..(Dr. Hsiung) has to reread..to try to understand..he would have to do..other people..there might be new discussions..people getting upset..lead to ..further comments could be made..would aggravate..bring the past into the present...].
My perspective here is that there is not a {past} or a {present}. Anyone can see any of the posts here, be them in the archives or not, >at the [present] time<. The archives are pages. They are pages before other pages and like a book, they precede what is posted and give definition to the next page. If one reads the last chapter of a book only, could they know what the book was about? I think that if someone read only the last chapter of a book and was interested in it, that they would probably start reading the book from its beginning to find out what the last chapter meant. There are people posting here that they go through the previous pages (archives). Dr. Hsiung has posted something like that the previous pages show what it is like here. The archives >have been< amended by Dr. Hsiung without people getting upset. An why would someone here get upset if posts that IMO that have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or foster defamation toward me are notated as being uncivil?
Then there is the question of why posts that IMO have the potential to arrouse antisemitic feelings or have the potential to defame me were not notated as being uncivil when the were first posted. There could be several possibilities for that to have happened.
A. DR. Hsiung didn't read those posts at there innitial posting.
B. The deputies did not read them either
C. No one alerted Dr. Hsiung or the deputies about those posts
D. Something else.
But be advised reader here, that I objected to most those post at their innnitial appearing, sometimes within minuets after they were posted to Dr. Hsiung and all the deputies. This could put a different perspective IMO to why those posts are not notated as being uncivil and Dr. Hsiung has posted that he does what in his thinking will be good for the community as a whole.
DR. Hsiung also writes something like that [...I know it when it can be seen...]. Well, if he knows it when it can be seen, then could not there be the fair question as to why those posts in question are not notated as being uncivil?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:702458
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/702761.html