Posted by Lou Pilder on October 25, 2006, at 6:52:40
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to muffled-unsancdefam, posted by mike lynch on October 24, 2006, at 11:58:19
Friends,
It is written here,[...if (Dr. Hsiung) is not giving infractions..on the religion (Faith) board..that is >inconsistant<...].
I ask myself;
A. Could the word,{inconsistant} be equivalent to {incongruous} as used here in this post?
The word {inconsistant} could mean;
1.incongruous
2.contradictory
3.unequal
4.other related definitions
The word,{incongruous} could mean,{inharmonious}
This could lead to that the statement by mike in question here, could mean,[...if (Dr. Hsiung) is not giving infractions..on the religion (Faith) board..that is {inharmonious}...].
Now is not one of the principles that governs the acceptability of the mission of the forum is that it is >civil<? And is not to be civil is to in some way have {harmony}?
Thearfore, could it be that what mike wrote could be,[...if {DR Hsiung)is not giving infractions..on the religion (Faith) board..that is not |civil|...?]
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:696516
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/697550.html