Posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2006, at 19:34:25
In reply to Re: Lou's reply to fayeroe, posted by fayeroe on October 11, 2006, at 18:32:24
Friends,
It is written here,[...a stretch for me to imagine ...a volunteer moderator.. is responsible as a volunteer firefighter...].
The administrative discussion here is about if the rule that Dr. Hsiung has, that a deputy does not have to intercede, has a rational or authority for the rule to be reasonable.
We now have a post here that states that [...it is a stretch for that one poster to imagine that >anyone< could suggest that a volunteer moderator here is as responsible as a volunteer firefighter...a poster chooses to be here...a fire...isn't something...to choose...].
I ask;
A. could not the people living in the villiage also have chosen to live there?
B. If one chose to be in an internet mental-health community that had a policy to provide a safe envoironment so that others could not harm them by defamation and racism, could they also not be entitiled to the same protection of their emotional and psychological state from defamation and racism as the people in the villiage are entitled to protection to their property from fire?
C. If a member has defamation directed to them here, is it because they {chose} to have the defamation directed to them? If not, then could the emotional damage from racism and defamation not be chosen in as much as the physical damage from a fire not be >chosen<?
Lou
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:693800
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060918/msgs/693927.html