Posted by Jakeman on June 21, 2006, at 22:55:26
In reply to Re: What folks have been saying, posted by Jost on June 21, 2006, at 22:47:47
Jost I am lost too. I see comments about an 8 week block, but I was talking about the 4 week block on Estella.
warm regards, Jke
> This is probably completely moot, to say the least, but I have one question about the following response by Dr. Bob to jakeman's request to review the blocking of Estella for the general comment about religion.
>
> I may misunderstand the following, which seems to be Dr.B's answer. As I read it (please correct me if I'm not following), Bob is saying that reconsideration of the block on Estella is moot, because she committed a second act of incivility for which she was blocked. Thus the second block supercedes the first one (about which the review request is being made)--so the first block no longer governs, and Jake isn't contesting the second block.
>
> But as I say, the second link here is to a post by Alexandra_k. So I'm a bit confused, since I assume that Estella and Alexandra_k aren't the same person (given other rules).
>
> Is there some other second uncivil message that led Estella to be blocked? Or am I misreading the second link, in ascribing it to someone other than Estella?
>
> Could someone explain? Because I'm not following this part of the thread.
>
> Jost
>
> >
> > --
> >
> > > Dr. Bob, would you reconsider this block on Estella? Again, why is it moot?
> > >
> > > Jake
> >
> > Regarding reconsidering, see Dinah's excellent translation:
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060525/msgs/658093.html
> >
> > I think it's kind of moot because she was blocked again:
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060525/msgs/654732.html
> >
> > after the block being discussed:
> >
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/poli/20060417/msgs/646629.html
> >
> > Bob
>
>
poster:Jakeman
thread:646675
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20060525/msgs/659993.html