Posted by Nickengland on July 14, 2005, at 16:49:20
In reply to Lou's reply to Dr./ Hsiung's reply to Lou-shun? » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou Pilder on July 10, 2005, at 9:40:31
>Sometimes it's more "conducive to civic harmony and welfare" just not to reply. If it's hard not to reply, another alternative is not even reading in the first place.
>Bob
Hello Lou,
From reading all the posts you have written regarding this matter I see that you feel there is a potential that in fact this was directly aimed at you etc etc etc (I've read the whole thread)
I personally think perhaps both aspects (your point of view and Dr Bob's point of view are correct) of this whole thread. Your point of view being, the fact that maybe indirectly this message was about you, as well as being in a general format.
When Dr Bob said
>Sometimes it's more "conducive to civic harmony and welfare" just not to reply. If it's hard not to reply, another alternative is not even reading in the first place.
I can understand this completely. The reason being from when we had our last little discussion....You suggested to me that I look through the archives to see who actually supports your posts. This I did. I actually only turned up a small number of posts through the google search, so I looked through the archives from the dated topics at the top of the pages.
If I remember correctly I was looking back about 2-3 years ago. Maybe 2002 to be correct when you first actually joined under the name of Lou Pilder and lou pilder without the capitals. (if I remember correctly)
I read your very first posts and many, many more after that with great interest. I saw all of the information about how people have to unlock the "7 gates" and how you think psychiatric drugs are evil. The way you think through the "sounds of music" and that you are a former maths teacher. I also read how you used to talk about religion quite alot of the time in soical/babble and so because of your posts (i think) this is the reason why the "faith" board was opened.
You used to post quite abit in babble/medications back then. Now back at time you used to get blocked quite abit yourself and recieve a fair few PBC's....
Now at the same time back then and up until this present day...There have been a very large amount of people who have recieved PBC because they have spoken/replied to your posts. People (from what I have seen and read) have also left babble and been blocked who engaged in discussion with you.
Perhaps because there are a high volume of people, who when reply to your messages, or get involved in a discussion with yourself - a large amount of these people have ended up with a PBC and so have not been able to remain civil.
So in conclusion when Dr Bob said what he did, maybe he was going on past experience. To prevent more people getting PBC's and perhaps blocks. In this way he was promoting civility, I think.
Kind regards
Nick
Ps If you want me to post any archives to support what I have said, I will be willing to do that.
poster:Nickengland
thread:525619
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050628/msgs/527614.html