Posted by Toph on March 20, 2005, at 7:34:47
In reply to Re: responsibility, posted by Dr. Bob on March 19, 2005, at 17:02:39
>
> >...a democratic structure would rely on representatives to care for all members
>
> ...That's a "responsibility" that's already diffused, among all posters.
>
> And it doesn't extend to me, so I wouldn't see it as extending to deputies in their deputy roles, either. It would still be up to them in their poster roles whether or not they supported particular members.
>But isn't it ultimately the responsibility of the administrator to support a group member who is injured and not receiving support. Support could take the form of vigilance against a "mob-like" action against a peticular individual. So, your resonsibility in more "devolved" than "diffused." I'm curious, was there a time in the beginning when you had to model support to participants?
Toph
poster:Toph
thread:458927
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20050219/msgs/473106.html