Posted by Lou Pilder on January 7, 2005, at 20:25:30
In reply to Re: link for replacemment theology-B » Lou Pilder, posted by AuntieMel on January 7, 2005, at 16:57:59
The poster wrote,[...the doctrine,(replacement theology) ...the same as putting down those of other faiths...].
Replacement theology sometimes needs to be deduced from what is stated. For instance in this post that writes,[...no unclean thing can enter into His kingdom...save it be those that have washed their garments in my blood...].
This statement has the potential, IMO, to advocate replacement theology because the words, [..."no" unclean person...save those that are washed ...] is used. The (imparitive?), "no", speaks for itself in relation to the guidlines of the forum, unless some explanation could cause the statement to not be outside the guidlines of the faith forum and I am asking anyone to explaine how the statement could be in accordance with the guidlines here.
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faith/20041120/msgs/437229.html
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:438834
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041218/msgs/439173.html