Posted by Lou Pilder on January 7, 2005, at 7:10:55
In reply to Re: Lou's response, posted by Dr. Bob on January 6, 2005, at 23:57:37
Dr Hsiung,
You wrote,[...it might not be considered civil to call a post antisemitic...].
I am requesting that you clarify as to what rational is used to {...call a post antisemitic...}.
Could any of the following constutute that the post that the statement was contained in be determined as {...antisemitic...}?If you see a distingushing charactoristic that determines as to if a post can be called antisemitic or not, could you point that out? If you could, then I could know ahead of time as to what is civil or not in relation to calling a post antisemitic.
A.any statement that could have one to think that the statement says that the jews killed Christ.
B.any statement that says that the jews are filthy people
C. any statement that says that the jews are full of all manner of abominations
D.replacment theology
E. any statement that says that those that honor any God besides Jesus are not saved
F. any statement that says that the jews that keep the commandments of their God, as they think that their God wants them to, are hypocrites.
G. others to be given.
Lou Pilder
poster:Lou Pilder
thread:438834
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20041218/msgs/438909.html