Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research

Posted by stjames on April 19, 2003, at 15:28:24

In reply to Psycho-Babble no longer considered research, posted by Dr. Bob on April 19, 2003, at 9:21:30

> I may still have the option of publishing case studies, which are generally not considered research ("a systematic investigation ... designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge").
It seems to me that what you published in the past
(about PB) falls under "case studies", correct ?

I like the idea of confirming someone's understanding of what's involved, though, so I've kept the quiz.
>
> Bob

Good idea.

Thread

Psycho-Babble no longer considered research Dr. Bob 4/19/03
Re: Hooooorraaayyyy!!!!! » Dr. Bob Dinah 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research NikkiT2 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research » Dr. Bob Oddipus Rex 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research Dr. Bob 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research » Dr. Bob shar 4/19/03
Thanks for letting us know!! (nm) » Dr. Bob Janelle 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research stjames 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research noa 4/20/03
Agree with Shar-hope Boards continue (nm) Fi 4/20/03
Re: financial hit Dr. Bob 4/21/03
Re: financial hit » Dr. Bob Dinah 4/21/03
Re: financial hit » Dr. Bob wendy b. 4/21/03
Re: financial hit NikkiT2 4/21/03
Re: Voluntary members? » Dr. Bob jane d 4/21/03
Re: financial hit » Dr. Bob Fi 4/21/03
PS Fi 4/21/03
Re: financial hit stjames 4/21/03
Re: financial hit Dr. Bob 4/22/03
Re: financial hit noa 4/22/03
...
Re: PBC underwear » Ron Hill shar 4/26/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:stjames thread:220587
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030404/msgs/220693.html

	for
in