Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research » Dr. Bob

Posted by Oddipus Rex on April 19, 2003, at 12:32:14

In reply to Psycho-Babble no longer considered research, posted by Dr. Bob on April 19, 2003, at 9:21:30

So if you wanted to write an article like the first one is the Review Board saying that you can't or is it saying that you really didn't need informed consent for something like that after all? What brought all this about?

> I may still have the option of publishing
Who's going to determine if you have that option? Would you need to get any additional permission from the subject of the case studies or would the old permissions be enough?
Well, I'm a bit disheartened. While others may have considered themselves lab rats I of course always considered myself a fellow researcher as well as a subject ;).
Best wishes

Thread

Psycho-Babble no longer considered research Dr. Bob 4/19/03
Re: Hooooorraaayyyy!!!!! » Dr. Bob Dinah 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research NikkiT2 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research » Dr. Bob Oddipus Rex 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research Dr. Bob 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research » Dr. Bob shar 4/19/03
Thanks for letting us know!! (nm) » Dr. Bob Janelle 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research stjames 4/19/03
Re: Psycho-Babble no longer considered research noa 4/20/03
Agree with Shar-hope Boards continue (nm) Fi 4/20/03
Re: financial hit Dr. Bob 4/21/03
Re: financial hit » Dr. Bob Dinah 4/21/03
Re: financial hit » Dr. Bob wendy b. 4/21/03
Re: financial hit NikkiT2 4/21/03
Re: Voluntary members? » Dr. Bob jane d 4/21/03
Re: financial hit » Dr. Bob Fi 4/21/03
...
Re: PBC underwear » Ron Hill shar 4/26/03

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Oddipus Rex thread:220587
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030404/msgs/220631.html