Posted by ayuda on March 23, 2003, at 20:39:51
In reply to Lou's respomse to ayuda's post-FM » ayuda, posted by Lou Pilder on March 23, 2003, at 20:28:09
> ayuda,
> You wrote,[...I mean the people that keep arguing with him concerning his standards and perameters...I feel that those people are troublemakers because...it is not being cooperative...].
> Sorry, but this forum has a provision to object. There have been changes by Dr. Bob, for he says that he [...is open to feedback...]and,[...I am not perfect...].
> The administrative board is for [...improvments...]. and how can one write that they want things improved here if they can not object to what they percieve to be something that must be improved? When you wrote that,[...those that keep arguing with him are troublemekers..], are you saying that evryone is really not supposed to argue with him, because evryone must [accept] what they percieve as an injustice or they could be labled by you as an {uncooperative person}? If so, then could you clarify whether or not you favor the provision of the administrative board that Dr. Bob has provided here for those that want [improvement of the site]or if you think that the admin. board should not exist? If you could, then I could respond accordingly.
> LouI think that maybe we are talking about two different things, because I don't disagree with you. I am referring to those people who repeatedly do things like run other people down or make disparaging remarks about other people's ethnicity or religion, and then get mad at Dr. Bob for blocking them. I agree that sometimes somethings need to be debated, as you say, and that Dr. Bob understands that this board can benefit from some dissention.
poster:ayuda
thread:201678
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20030221/msgs/211961.html